Reference: Mitas, L., Mitasova, H., 1999, Spatial Interpolation. In: P.Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, D.W.Rhind (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, GeoInformation International, Wiley, 481-492.
Lubos Mitas and Helena Mitasova
Abstract
This chapter formulates the problem of spatial interpolation from scattered data as a method for prediction and representation of multi-variate fields. The role and specific issues of interpolation for GIS applications are discussed and methods based on locality, geostatistical and variational concepts are described. Properties of interpolation methods are illustrated by examples of 2D, 3D and 4D interpolations of elevation, precipitation, and chemical concentrations data. Future directions focus on a robust data analysis with automatic choice of spatially variable interpolation parameters, and model or process-based interpolation.
Illustrations
Interpolation of elevation surface using different methods available
in GIS:
Fig.1a Voronoi diagram
Fig.1b TIN
Fig.1c IDW
Fig.1d Kriging
Fig.1e Topogrid
Fig.1f s.surf.tps/s.surf.rst , see(RST
method)
Impact of interpolation on results of erosion/deposition modeling:
Fig.2a
Fig.2b
Fig.2c
Interpolation of a large DEM using segmented processing:
Fig.3
Fig.3inset
Fig.3leg
Interpolation of rainfall data without and with incorporation of terrain
influence:
Fig.4a
Fig.4b
the imapct of terrain can tuned using tension anisotropy in vertical direction
animated gif
mpeg movie
Regularized spline with tension: impact of tension parameter in 2D and
3D:
Fig.5a gif
Fig.5b
Fig.5c
Fig.5d
Fig.5e
Fig.5f
Snapshot from quad-variate interpolation of chemical concentrations
data:
Fig.6